Inappropriate Lipstick of the Summer: Soufflé Nude

Ruth Crilly A Model Recommends

My lipstick of the summer seems to be a shade that’s somehow entirely inappropriate for the hotter months. Whilst the rest of the beauty world wears the hot oranges and fiery reds, enhancing their sunkissed skin and getting away with just a slick of lipstick and a pair of statement shades, I’m stuck firmly in last season. A pinkish-nude lipstick from Dior that looks amazing with a hint of pale bronzer and a slightly smokey eye, but would probably look a bit “Magda-from-Something-About-Mary” against very bronzed, beach-sexy skin.

ruth crilly a model recommends

But I’m strictly low-maintenance this summer – I doubt a hot orange lipstick will even make it into my cosmetics bag. Dior’s Soufflé Nude (£26.50 here) is my easy, chic, no-effort option. It looks smart and pulled together and I don’t need to check my teeth every three minutes for red bits. It does require a bit of dark eyeshadow smudged into the outer corners of my eyes, just to offset the nude lips and stop my features from completely disappearing into my face, but that takes all of ten seconds to do. If you haven’t got a Real Techniques smudge brush (part of the eye set here) then grab one – I did a post on easy smokey eyes earlier on this year, give it a read if you missed it the first time around.

I’m wearing the Rouge Dior Couture Colour lipstick in Soufflé Nude in the July Favourites video here.

The post Inappropriate Lipstick of the Summer: Soufflé Nude appeared first on A Model Recommends.


© 2016 A Model Recommends®: all opinions are my own and any sponsored or paid posts will always be very clearly marked. I accept press samples and receive product and services to review as part of my job. Outward links to retailers will usually be affiliate links. Please see here for full “about” section and disclaimer.  A Model Recommends and Ruth Crilly are registered trademarks.

Continue reading

Bourjois Foundations: Healthy Mix Serum vs City Radiance

Bourjois Foundations: Healthy Mix vs City Radiance

When I went to write this comparison post I realised that the Bourjois Healthy Mix Serum foundation didn’t have its own page here on the website. A travesty! It’s such a good little base – it behaves exactly how I want a foundation to behave, with a light and comfortable texture and a fresh, glowy finish. I recently pulled it back out of my stored makeup collection so that it can live in the house (rather than the cosmetics quagmire of my office) where it will be loved and well-used and perhaps even have the opportunity to travel the world. It’s a fine old life for the chosen foundations, I tell you! (Currently the chosen ones in the en suite cabinet are: Armani Maestro Glow, Chanel Vitalumiere Aqua, Chanel Les Beiges, Chanel Perfection Lumiere Velvet (I’m working on a comparison post), Max Factor Miracle Match and Laura Mercier’s Silk Creme Foundation, which I think I prefer to the new Candleglow, but the jury’s still out.)

Anyway, I wanted to compare the new Bourjois City Radiance foundation to the older favourite, Healthy Mix Serum Gel Foundation. City Radiance is in a tube, calls itself a “skin protecting foundation” with “brightening effect” and has an SPF30. Healthy Mix says “instant blending gel, flawless complexion, undetectable coverage” on the back of the pump-action bottle and “16h radiance-boosting” on the front – the two foundations are after pretty much the same thing. Glowing skin. Though it does seem that the City Radiance leans more towards the idea of protection – protecting the skin from the ravages of city life perhaps? With the sun protection and the “anti-pollution screen” that I’ve just spotted on the front of the tube, that sounds about right. In all honestly, protection against environmental factors is something I look for in my skincare, if anything, so I can’t say I’m really going to dwell on that at all. I just want to compare them as cosmetics – coverage, finish, feel.

ruth crilly foundation testing

Things didn’t get off to a great start for little new-tube City Radiance, because though I have my perfect colour match in the Healthy Mix (52, Vanille) I really couldn’t find my ideal partner in City Radiance. I swatched 1, 2 and 3 and decided that 2 was the best match, but you can see in the (absolutely gorgeous, not) photo above that at first glance the match didn’t look too great. (Bottom stripe is 1, top is 2.) However, shade 2 did blend out really well – behold:

ruth crilly foundation testing

I only have it on the right-hand side of my face, in the picture – you can see that not only is the shade more than okay, there’s a real glow going on. The City Radiance is definitely brightening and I’d say that the coverage is very good, though I didn’t find it the most pleasant foundation to apply. It was ever so slightly too thick for my liking. But let’s come back to that and skip on over to the juicy, fresh-feel Healthy Mix Serum and its lightweight gel formula – I’ve applied this to the left-hand side, as you look at the photograph:

ruth crilly foundation testing

Now is it me, or does the Healthy Mix just look a bit more real? Less flat? I’ve stared at my face for so many hours, now, that I’m struggling to uncross my eyes, so I would love to know what you think. I’ve done some close-ups of my skin, too. (God, you must really want to know about these foundations if you’ve read this far! It’s like a GCSE science project!)

First, the City Radiance:

ruth crilly foundation testing

and then the Healthy Mix Serum:

ruth crilly foundation testing

(Sorry – that’s a pillow crease you can faintly see down the side of my face. Ha.) You might not be able to see any difference at all, but zooming in on the computer I can tell you that the Healthy Mix does look just a bit more natural whereas the City Radiance is slightly flat – the skin has less of its natural variation and character left, probably because the coverage is slightly heavier.

City Radiance reminds me a bit of a CC Cream, though I realise that CC Creams come in many textures and variations; it has a slight something that I want to call chalky, or claggy, but is neither. It’s a creamy texture that settles to almost exactly the same finish as the Healthy Mix, I just don’t think it has the same beautiful high-end feel.

For me, the older classic beats the new launch. City Radiance has a different lean, as I noted before – highly portable in its little tube and with the added “anti-pollution screen” and SPF 30, though I can’t imagine you’d ever apply enough of it to provide adequate protection, if you were relying solely on that. It’s still a good base, and if you want mega-glow and a more uniform look to the skin then certainly opt for this one (or the amazing Effaclar BB Blur for oilier skin). But if you think you’ll be bothered by a thicker feel (I’ve just thought – it’s very much like the feel of a suncream, which makes sense!) and you’re pining for that dewy, juicy, moisturised look that we all so loved before all of the more velvety finish foundations came along, plump for Healthy Mix Serum.

Bourjois City Radiance is £9.99 at Boots.com here and the Healthy Mix Serum is £10.99 here.

The post Bourjois Foundations: Healthy Mix Serum vs City Radiance appeared first on A Model Recommends.

Continue reading

Bourjois Rouge Edition Lip Velvet New Shade

Happy Nude Year

Everyone’s loving the Bourjois Rouge Edition Lip Velvet – a lush, matte consistency lip product that’s proving its worth in terms of longevity and colour impact. I never wear matte lips so I’ve been scooting around the internets to see what other bloggers think and I haven’t found a negative word yet!

Happy Nude Year

Happy Nude Year (I know.. I’m biting my tongue) is a buff pink shade – the kind of colour that’s like your lips but more so. I think it will suit just about every single skin shade. Happy Nude Year joins eight other shades of Bourjois Rouge Edition Lip Velvets. Boots has an offer on Lip Velvets (lots of offers on everything actually) that is equivalent to a three for two, and they’re £8.99 each. Happy Nude Year hasn’t hit the shelves yet – give it a few weeks.

The post Bourjois Rouge Edition Lip Velvet New Shade appeared first on British Beauty Blogger.

Continue reading

Pretty Aerin Perfume: Ikat Jasmine

aerin fragrance review

Aerin perfume: it was always going to be very pretty, wasn’t it? The cosmetics line certainly is, with its pale pink packaging and its gold compacts and its flattering, illuminating makeup shades. The perfumes don’t let the side down; they come in petite glass bottles with chic labelling and smooth, precious-stone-like lids. All very feminine, but in a pleasingly modern way.

Ikat Jasmine is one of the only jasmine fragrances I can bring myself to wear; I love the smell of jasmine in the air, but I’m not too keen when it hits the skin. Or my skin, to be more accurate. I don’t mind it so much on other people, but I can find it a little overwhelming and heavy on myself. It gives me a headache. Saying that, I’ve used plenty of body products containing Jasmine and not suffered any dramatic fainting fits; perhaps it’s just when the scent is nearer to my head!

More fragrance posts…

Back to Ikat Jasmine and its delicate, clean scent. It reminds me of freshly-washed hair – maybe my Mum used to use something with jasmine in when I was small, I’ll have to ask her. But yes; freshly-washed hair and clean, inviting bathrooms. If this perfume was a bathroom (random!), it would be one in a beautiful beachfront house, with whitewashed floorboards and one of those big claw-footed baths with old-fashioned taps. The window would be open and the long white curtains would be billowing in the slight breeze, and it would be the type of bathroom that had stylish black and white photos on the wall, but a collection of starfish and conch shells lined up along the windowsill. (Sorry, been obsessing over too many interiors mags recently!)

But there’s a method to my description madness; Ikat Jasmine seems to have this sea-air freshness about it, rather than the sometimes cloying, heady, incense-stick richness that jasmine fragrances can often have. I have a feeling that the appeal of this particular jasmine, for me, at least, is down to the hints of tuberose and sandalwood – neither overly apparent on their own, but both subtly hanging about in the background taking the edge of the jasmine and softening everything up a bit, making it all every so slightly powdery. I won’t say that Ikat Jasmine will ever be on my “popular shelf”, but it has given me a new appreciation of white florals.

(Disclaimer: it’s quite possible that everything I smell at the moment is completely off-kilter. I’m not sure quite how much pregnancy hormones affect smell in the second trimester! I’ll probably have to re-visit all of my fragrance posts after the baby’s born…)

(Update: I’ve just seen that I wrote a post about Jasmine-Scented Things a few years ago. How tastes change, so funny that I liked Jasmine Rouge from Tom Ford – it’s way too much for me now!)

Aerin’s Ikat Jasmine is £85 from JohnLewis.com

The post Pretty Aerin Perfume: Ikat Jasmine appeared first on A Model Recommends.

Continue reading